<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NetworkWorld: iPods are ’security threat’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/04/12/networkworld-ipods-are-%e2%80%99security-threat%e2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/04/12/networkworld-ipods-are-%e2%80%99security-threat%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description>Bringing Fire To The Village: Your Source For Computer, Network &#38; Information Security News from Dave Lewis, Security Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/04/12/networkworld-ipods-are-%e2%80%99security-threat%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-32640</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/04/12/networkworld-ipods-are-%e2%80%99security-threat%e2%80%99/#comment-32640</guid>
		<description>The problem is not technology. It&#039;s people. I lose my patience with vendors trying to sell you the latest thing to stop problem X. Security by bandaid and duct tape just doesn&#039;t cut it. In some cases there has to be a wholesale tear down and rebuild of the underlying infosec program. 

The real problem (iPods as an example) resides on a much more fundamental level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is not technology. It&#8217;s people. I lose my patience with vendors trying to sell you the latest thing to stop problem X. Security by bandaid and duct tape just doesn&#8217;t cut it. In some cases there has to be a wholesale tear down and rebuild of the underlying infosec program. </p>
<p>The real problem (iPods as an example) resides on a much more fundamental level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/04/12/networkworld-ipods-are-%e2%80%99security-threat%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-32637</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/04/12/networkworld-ipods-are-%e2%80%99security-threat%e2%80%99/#comment-32637</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you.  I find the ISO definition of threat to be way too broad.  I&#039;d rather narrow it to things that can act on their own.  That way, risk analysis is much easier and makes me more effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you.  I find the ISO definition of threat to be way too broad.  I&#8217;d rather narrow it to things that can act on their own.  That way, risk analysis is much easier and makes me more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
