<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confirmation Of Stealth Windows Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/09/13/confirmation-of-stealth-windows-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/09/13/confirmation-of-stealth-windows-update/</link>
	<description>Bringing Fire To The Village: Your Source For Computer, Network &#38; Information Security News from Dave Lewis, Security Blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Microsoft Adds Potential NSA Access To Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/09/13/confirmation-of-stealth-windows-update/#comment-67773</link>
		<dc:creator>Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Microsoft Adds Potential NSA Access To Vista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 10:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/09/13/confirmation-of-stealth-windows-update/#comment-67773</guid>
		<description>[...] As if Vista had not managed to garner enough bad press on its own. Bruce Schneier reported yesterday that Microsoft has reintroduced its dual random number generator. This time in Vista SP1. That is the same as one he had written about previously. The catch is that, according to Schneier, this potentially provides an NSA back door. This is disabled by default. However, that is no guarantee that it won&#8217;t switched to the &#8220;on&#8221; position in a later patch release. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As if Vista had not managed to garner enough bad press on its own. Bruce Schneier reported yesterday that Microsoft has reintroduced its dual random number generator. This time in Vista SP1. That is the same as one he had written about previously. The catch is that, according to Schneier, this potentially provides an NSA back door. This is disabled by default. However, that is no guarantee that it won&#8217;t switched to the &#8220;on&#8221; position in a later patch release. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Microsoft Now Takes Blame For WSUS Update Error</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/09/13/confirmation-of-stealth-windows-update/#comment-59904</link>
		<dc:creator>Liquidmatrix Security Digest &#187; Microsoft Now Takes Blame For WSUS Update Error</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/09/13/confirmation-of-stealth-windows-update/#comment-59904</guid>
		<description>[...] puts hand up, &#8220;our bad&#8221;. After the story broke about the stealth updates Microsoft has admitted that they goofed. The problem hit he support [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] puts hand up, &#8220;our bad&#8221;. After the story broke about the stealth updates Microsoft has admitted that they goofed. The problem hit he support [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
