Short answer: SWEET MERCIFUL CRAP YES!
From Information Week:
McAfee CEO David DeWalt sees more companies are having the chief information security officer report to someone other than the CIO. The reasoning is security involves much more than data security—and that IT needs a watchdog over its attempts to secure information.
DeWalt spoke at the InformationWeek 500 Conference in Tucson Tuesday, spotlighting the five broad trends he sees in security. In a conversation after his keynote, DeWalt spotlighted one other change, with the CISO increasingly reporting to the CFO or another executive.
I have always held the position that it was a CISO who reports to the head of IT is a perdue that knows his fate is sealed. How can a CISO affect change in any demonstrable way when his/her hands are tied behind their back? It is in the best interest of a CIO to keep a short leash on a CISO for fear the inadequacies of their day to day operations are drawn out into the light (if that happens to be the situation).
But, who does this help? Certainly not the customers, shareholders or the organization for that matter. Nope, the only one who benefits from having the CISO report to the CIO is the CIO. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer?
UPDATE: OK, on further reflection (thanks shrdlu) I should wrap some more text around this idea. IT and Infosec need to work together not at opposites. That being said IT needs to be held accountable. On the other side of the coin Infosec needs to be technically capable. I’m fortunate in that I have come from a technical background but, many Infosec folks do not have that skill set. So, yes, that would be a real stumbling block. To be truly effective (as a CISO) you have to win the hearts and minds of the very people that you are working with. The “prince of darkness” is not a moniker that would denote a spirit of detente. If you do not have the support, your Infosec program will fall on its face.
Tags: CISO Reporting, CISO, CIO, CISO Accountability




























