<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions Raised About Information Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/11/24/questions-raised-about-information-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/11/24/questions-raised-about-information-security/</link>
	<description>Bringing Fire To The Village: Your Source For Computer, Network &#38; Information Security News from Dave Lewis, Security Blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/11/24/questions-raised-about-information-security/#comment-66343</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/11/24/questions-raised-about-information-security/#comment-66343</guid>
		<description>@Beach

Agreed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Beach</p>
<p>Agreed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beach</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/11/24/questions-raised-about-information-security/#comment-66336</link>
		<dc:creator>Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2007/11/24/questions-raised-about-information-security/#comment-66336</guid>
		<description>This is ludicrous and a fallacy.  Security and usability are not mutually exclusive.  Adding security after-the-fact often has a negative impact on usability.  I was reading a few days ago (can't find link) about a car analogy for this discussion, how adding security after the fact would be like bolting a lock to the outside of the car door after it was manufactured -- not very practical and impedes the "usability" because now the owner must carry a key and use it every time.

Designing and building a usable system and a secure system should be done at the same time and they are not mutually exclusive.  The argument that they are is a product of a poor architect and security being added too late in the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ludicrous and a fallacy.  Security and usability are not mutually exclusive.  Adding security after-the-fact often has a negative impact on usability.  I was reading a few days ago (can&#8217;t find link) about a car analogy for this discussion, how adding security after the fact would be like bolting a lock to the outside of the car door after it was manufactured &#8212; not very practical and impedes the &#8220;usability&#8221; because now the owner must carry a key and use it every time.</p>
<p>Designing and building a usable system and a secure system should be done at the same time and they are not mutually exclusive.  The argument that they are is a product of a poor architect and security being added too late in the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
