<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/</link>
	<description>Bringing Fire To The Village: Your Source For Computer, Network &#38; Information Security News from Dave Lewis, Security Blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/#comment-68068</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/#comment-68068</guid>
		<description>Maybe patients can use contract law to enhance the privacy of their health records.  &lt;a href="http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/02/contracts-for-patient-privacy.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/02/contracts-for-patient-privacy.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe patients can use contract law to enhance the privacy of their health records.  <a href="http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/02/contracts-for-patient-privacy.html" rel="nofollow">http://hack-igations.blogspot.com/2008/02/contracts-for-patient-privacy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Gleason</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/#comment-68065</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Gleason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/#comment-68065</guid>
		<description>I'd like to know more about the details of how Google Health will work, especially how would my records be united (what identifier?) if my medical records are not all store in a common repository, such as Cleveland Clinic? 

Google APIs are mentioned -- do we know anything about them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know more about the details of how Google Health will work, especially how would my records be united (what identifier?) if my medical records are not all store in a common repository, such as Cleveland Clinic? </p>
<p>Google APIs are mentioned &#8212; do we know anything about them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/#comment-68062</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/#comment-68062</guid>
		<description>@ Tom

Fair point. Thanks for the comment.

cheers,
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Tom</p>
<p>Fair point. Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Scrace</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/#comment-68061</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Scrace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/21/dr-google/#comment-68061</guid>
		<description>If this were a mandatory government project to centralise all your personal information in one database then the outcry would be fully justified. In this case, though, it is a private company providing an entirely voluntary service. It is when non-submission to a database becomes a crime against the state, and not just a company, that we should object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this were a mandatory government project to centralise all your personal information in one database then the outcry would be fully justified. In this case, though, it is a private company providing an entirely voluntary service. It is when non-submission to a database becomes a crime against the state, and not just a company, that we should object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
