<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US, CDN Agencies Seize $78 Mil Of Fake Cisco Gear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/29/us-cdn-agencies-seize-78-mil-of-fake-cisco-gear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/29/us-cdn-agencies-seize-78-mil-of-fake-cisco-gear/</link>
	<description>Bringing Fire To The Village: Your Source For Computer, Network &#38; Information Security News from Dave Lewis, Security Blogger</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/29/us-cdn-agencies-seize-78-mil-of-fake-cisco-gear/#comment-68094</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/29/us-cdn-agencies-seize-78-mil-of-fake-cisco-gear/#comment-68094</guid>
		<description>@CG

You know, I'd love to get more information on this haul. I think that in lieu of more information that we can safely assume that if one were to taunt &lt;a href"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Fun_Ball" rel="nofollow"&gt;happy fun ball&lt;/a&gt; it might explode. 

I did receive a few emails where readers thought that the counterfeit hardware might actually run better. That would be a interesting test. Running benchmarks between the two. 

hmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CG</p>
<p>You know, I&#8217;d love to get more information on this haul. I think that in lieu of more information that we can safely assume that if one were to taunt <a href"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Fun_Ball" rel="nofollow">happy fun ball</a> it might explode. </p>
<p>I did receive a few emails where readers thought that the counterfeit hardware might actually run better. That would be a interesting test. Running benchmarks between the two. </p>
<p>hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CG</title>
		<link>http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/29/us-cdn-agencies-seize-78-mil-of-fake-cisco-gear/#comment-68092</link>
		<dc:creator>CG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liquidmatrix.org/blog/2008/02/29/us-cdn-agencies-seize-78-mil-of-fake-cisco-gear/#comment-68092</guid>
		<description>“Counterfeit network hardware entering the marketplace raises significant public safety concerns and must be stopped,”

huh?  does the stuff work or not?  is it running a current version of IOS?  can i patch it?  not saying that kind of stuff is ok but a significant public safety concern?  does it blow up when it receives is 200 billionth SYN packet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Counterfeit network hardware entering the marketplace raises significant public safety concerns and must be stopped,”</p>
<p>huh?  does the stuff work or not?  is it running a current version of IOS?  can i patch it?  not saying that kind of stuff is ok but a significant public safety concern?  does it blow up when it receives is 200 billionth SYN packet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
